Main Menu

PEB-Pacific Edge

Started by Shareguy, Jun 29, 2022, 08:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LoungeLizard

Quote from: raW tent Buffer on Apr 29, 2025, 11:04 AMSounds to me like they expected/wanted the amount to be higher?

Agreed, but they have a difficult path to negotiate. Too cheap isn't business-sustainable; too expensive and patients may not be prepared to pay. Never a dull moment with PEB.

Left Field

Quote from: Poet on Apr 29, 2025, 11:21 AMthe re-imbursement price for cxbladder when it first gained coverage in 2020 was $USD760 so $US1018 for triage plus probably isn't all that disappointing.
All a bit moot though isn't it? until they can get coverage.

Here's what PEB were aiming for back in July 2024

"Pacific Edge has made what we believe is a compelling case for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) to price Cxbladder Detect+ via 'Crosswalk', a process that acknowledges the advancement of
incorporating both RNA and DNA markers for the detection of bladder cancer in patient samples.

If CMS shares our view and agrees that Detect+ should attract a price of US$1,590, Pacific Edge
would gain significant upside to our existing market opportunity for hematuria evaluation."


So today's $1018 price better than the $760 they were getting, but not as high as they would have liked.

Can't help thinking a reason for the trading halt maybe that PEB could be evaluating a Cap Raise to allow them to progress based on this decision etc...... 

Pure speculation of course.

"The difficulty lies not in new ideas... but in escaping from old ideas." (J M Keynes.)

LoungeLizard

#512
Quote from: Left Field on Apr 29, 2025, 11:50 AMHere's what PEB were aiming for back in July 2024

"Pacific Edge has made what we believe is a compelling case for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) to price Cxbladder Detect+ via 'Crosswalk', a process that acknowledges the advancement of
incorporating both RNA and DNA markers for the detection of bladder cancer in patient samples.

If CMS shares our view and agrees that Detect+ should attract a price of US$1,590, Pacific Edge
would gain significant upside to our existing market opportunity for hematuria evaluation."


So today's $1018 price better than the $760 they were getting, but not as high as they would have liked.

Can't help thinking a reason for the trading halt maybe that PEB could be evaluating a Cap Raise to allow them to progress based on this decision etc...... 

Pure speculation of course.



The tone of the release and the numbers themselves sound positive:


"Hematuria evaluation tests currently represent around 81% of Pacific Edge's total US laboratory throughput. The US$1,018.44 price is a meaningful increase compared to the US$760 CMS price of our existing tests, because it increases the margin and margin percentage per test and improves the profitability of operating our front-line sales force. When coverage of Triage Plus is established, Pacific Edge will make migration from Triage a priority, noting that Detect tests are being migrated to Triage tests effective immediately given the February 2025 inclusion of Triage in the American Urological Association's microhematuria guideline."

Clearly Triage Plus is the immediate focus and there is reason to be hopeful that eventually it will be covered under Medicare.
 Agreed that PEB may have to do a cap raise to bridge the funding gap in the short term. I can imagine it would be well supported as I feel PEB's products are gaining traction, the Novitas decision notwithstanding.
 

Left Field

#513
More from PEB ..... sounding positive... (and no mention of a Cap Raise)

https://www.nzx.com/announcements/450711

Hematuria evaluation tests currently represent around 81% of Pacific Edge's total US laboratory throughput. The US$1,018.44 price is a meaningful increase compared to the US$760 CMS price of our existing tests, because it increases the margin and margin percentage per test and improves the profitability of operating our front-line sales force. When coverage of Triage Plus is established, Pacific Edge will make migration from Triage a priority, noting that Detect tests are being migrated to Triage tests effective immediately given the February 2025 inclusion of Triage in the American Urological Association's microhematuria guideline.
 
 Pacific Edge expects to submit a reconsideration request for coverage of Triage Plus as soon as the analytical validation (AV) and clinical validation (CV) studies have been published. The AV publication is being reviewed by the submitting authors and the CV publication, the DRIVE study , has already been submitted for publication.
 
 Pacific Edge Chief Executive Dr Peter Meintjes said: "We are very pleased that both MolDX and Novitas have recognized the novelty of Triage Plus in their pricing determinations with prices of US$1,018.44 and US$1,587.69 respectively. We have invested significant resources in Triage Plus – a multimodal test that combines DNA and RNA workflows with the outputs analyzed by a novel algorithm that provides dramatic performance improvement over existing tests and can be used on a broader patient population to assist clinicians to manage their hematuria patients as high, intermediate or low risk.
 
 "The resources needed to develop, validate and operate Triage Plus commercially are substantial, thus necessitating a higher price, but importantly when Triage Plus' performance characteristics are used in our existing budget impact model we observe that the improved performance characteristics has the potential for even greater savings to the Medicare system by reducing more unnecessary procedures and allowing clinicians to spend more time and clinical resources on those who need it most."


Onwards and upwards.........C'mon PEB you can do it!
 
"The difficulty lies not in new ideas... but in escaping from old ideas." (J M Keynes.)

Greekwatchdog

I suspect there will be more details coming out at the Full Year announcement next month. Be interesting to see what PEB have to say around expenditure to preserve cash and the prospect of a CR.

Unless they some how manage to come up with a solution I think it will be inevitable that a CR is needed within 12 months

Greekwatchdog

FYI posted on the other channel by 850man

Latest trial by Kaiser Permanente significantly involving 3353 patients, presented at the 2025 AUA conference. More info here:
https://www.urologytimes.com/view/cx...y-cystoscopies

850man

Quote from: Greekwatchdog on Apr 30, 2025, 12:01 PMFYI posted on the other channel by 850man

Latest trial by Kaiser Permanente significantly involving 3353 patients, presented at the 2025 AUA conference. More info here:
https://www.urologytimes.com/view/cx...y-cystoscopies

I think this trial only needs peer review before it further adds to the evidence in favour of CXB

Greekwatchdog

Results in
https://www.nzx.com/announcements/452559
Cap Raise in @ $.10 which I will participate in

winner (n)

#518
PEB Accumulated losses now $276,222,000 and like any growth company still growing

Truly amazing, after shareholders have contributed $294,458,000 .....soon to be over $0.3billion

I can say such things because I contributed some of that $294m years ago and fortunately more than doubled my money

Left Field

#519
My thoughts on todays news align with Balance on the other channel......

"Real shame for NZ Inc that PEB has suffered the US setbacks.

We need companies like PEB to be successful to inspire young NZers and provide opportunities.

Been there and done that myself with PEB. Like W69, I have done very well in the past with PEB and wish them & shareholders success.
"


However IMO, the 19% premium being charged for this cap rise is interesting to say the least!... (10c per share v last traded at 8.4c.)

"The difficulty lies not in new ideas... but in escaping from old ideas." (J M Keynes.)

LoungeLizard

Inevitable that a CR would be required and I still believe that ultimately coverage will be reinstated. I'm surprised a little at the SPP price of 10c - above the current market price. Might not affect the big institutions much but retail investors may look to buy on-market. I will participate in one form or another and hope that in 12 months time, when coverage is re-instated, investors will (finally) get their reward.  ;)

Greekwatchdog

The AUA guidelines and Gap Fill pricing re Triage + must mean something and with PEB already knocking down the Novitas door I suspect they are very confident of gaining coverage soon. Who knows what other contracts with major potential clients (John Hopkins have been reviewing since late 2019) going forward...

Pierre

PEB has raised $16 million at 10cps from institutional shareholders.
That should be good for some SP movement today.

LoungeLizard

Quote from: Pierre on Jun 03, 2025, 09:04 AMPEB has raised $16 million at 10cps from institutional shareholders.
That should be good for some SP movement today.

Yes, that's a good vote of confidence from the institutions. What the SP does will determine the level of participation from retail investors.

Left Field

I'm not surprised that so far today PEB retail investors have been able to purchase more shares below the 10c price paid by Institutes.

Interesting also is the timing of the retail offer as outlined below.

https://www.nzx.com/announcements/452692

"Pacific Edge is now targeting the opening of a NZ$5 million offer to eligible retail investors by way of a Share Purchase Plan (SPP) at the same NZ$0.10 cents per share offer price in July or early August 2025 (with the ability to accept oversubscriptions). A shareholder meeting to approve the Placement is planned for late July or early August 2025."

Why late July or August?  Perhaps PEB is hoping for good news to drive the SP north of 10c before that time?


"The difficulty lies not in new ideas... but in escaping from old ideas." (J M Keynes.)