Quote from: LoungeLizard on Aug 25, 2026, 01:39 PMYep, it's a disaster all round, but the Fisher managed funds have underperformed for years and the Board has done nothing about it and kept re-appointing Fisher. Is this the point where they finally give them heave-ho? I'm not a holder but I would want to see a change in fund manager and strategy together with a reduction in fees. If not, then just wind the funds up and pay shareholders out at NAV rate.If my recall is correct the board have said they will talk to the fisher funds manager about the sub performance, didn't detect at a glance a hint they might consider to terminate the contract though.
Quote from: LoungeLizard on Aug 26, 2026, 01:27 PMThe building and manufacturing industries are in decline - lot's of layoffs and bankruptcies.
It's margins and profits that are important - not total revenue. It's just very hard for an outfit like STU to cover its increasing cost base, hence the sell-off.
I fear that it is in terminal decline and may go the way of Metro Performance Glass.
Quote from: winner (n) on Aug 26, 2026, 11:03 AMIndustry trends are having an impact but STU isn't even keeping up with these trends ... like sales decline more than industry decline etc
Recent acquisitions show 0verall revenues are increasing but underlying business a disaster
And as shareguy implies selling off a few business units really only shows how stuffed they are
Quote from: Arbroath on Aug 25, 2026, 05:28 PMI'm a holder but would place no value on the Fletcher lawsuit.Totally the 70/ 75 cents offer was a joke & the board obviously did not take it seriously.
There's plenty of value in the balance sheet but with such a poor recent trading history and share price I'd say a $1.00-1.20 bid would wrap this up...